inFOCUSfour: ActivistSpotlight

Interview With Nyokabi Njogu

Biography

Nyokabi Njogu is the Legal Counsel at the Kenya Legal and Ethical Issues Network on HIV and AIDS (KELIN) and an Advocate of the High Court of Kenya. She holds a Bachelor of Laws from the Catholic University of Eastern Africa (Nairobi), a Master of Laws in Human Rights from the Central European University (Budapest), a Master of Business Administration in Human Resource Management from Daystar University (Nairobi), and a postgraduate degree in law from the Kenya School of Law. With over 14 years of legal practice and two decades of experience in the human rights space, she has previously served as a legal researcher in the Judiciary of Kenya, a lecturer at the Kenya School of Law, and a practitioner in private legal practice. As the Strategic Litigation Lead at KELIN, she specialises in feminist litigation, health rights, and social justice, leveraging the law to challenge systemic inequalities. A dedicated movement lawyer and an alumna of the Feminist Litigation Network (FLN), she holds the state accountable for the realisation women’s rights. Her contributions to feminist and human rights litigation have earned her recognition, including the CSO Lawyer of the Year award and inclusion in the Top 80 Women in Law list by the Nairobi Legal Awards, underscoring her impact in advancing justice for marginalised communities.

Hi Nyokabi, How are you? Please tell us about yourself.

Well, you know my name. I’ve worked at KELIN as the Strategic Litigation Lead for almost five years now. I am a human rights advocate and have been in legal practice for 14 years, though my involvement in human rights work actually spans 20 years. My journey began in law school, during my second year, when I got my first job as a research assistant. That role set the foundation for the work I do now, shaping my understanding of human rights and justice.

My first internship was with Justice Kibaya Laibuta, who is now a judge of appeal. Simultaneously, I worked with the Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) on their biennial Human Rights Report, where I conducted field research and interviews with various organizations. This role deepened my exposure to the realities of human rights work and helped me understand its critical importance.

I like to think of my career as a bridge between law and activism, particularly in feminist strategic litigation. Over the years, I have worked on cases that address structural inequalities, particularly in health rights, land and property rights, and access to justice for marginalized groups, particularly women.

Looking at your time at the Feminist Litigation Network, how did that experience shape your approach to feminist strategic litigation?

The Feminist Litigation Network (FLN) significantly sharpened my understanding of the systemic flaws within the law and its application. It made me see, in an even clearer way, how law can be both a tool of justice and oppression. One of the major learnings for me was recognizing how defamation laws have been weaponized against women who speak out about their experiences.

The FLN journey helped me see different meanings of justice beyond what the legal text prescribes. It taught me to engage with the law critically and to see the gaps that exist for women seeking justice. The feminist legal methods class we took was especially illuminating, reinforcing the idea that the law is not neutral, it often reinforces existing inequalities. We are using an inherently violent tool to redress violence against women, which is both ironic and frustrating.

Beyond the intellectual growth, FLN gifted me a network of like-minded lawyers who I can call on to discuss cases, refine legal arguments, and provide mutual support. The ethics of care that I learned in FLN also reshaped how I approach my work, making space for self-care and community accountability. Beyond that, I think just the network itself has been such a valuable tool for me, both professionally and personally. I got in there knowing only one person, a friend from school, but over time, I developed a strong support system. Having this network of people I can lean on to help me think through cases has been extremely useful. Those three years we spent together solidified friendships and professional relationships to the extent that now we call each other for support, whether it’s discussing a case or bringing in someone for their expertise.

You’ve had an extensive career spanning human rights research, academia, and legal practice. What inspired your shift towards feminist litigation, and how has movement lawyering influenced your work holding the state accountable for women’s rights?

This shift was both personal and professional. On a personal level, I grew up keenly aware of gender disparities. Even as a child, I knew that my relatives and I were not treated the same way, and I carried a deep indignation about the way society treats women.

I also fundamentally don’t like being told what to do—something that has fuelled my resistance to systems that dictate how women should behave, what they should aspire to, and what they should accept as their fate. Feminist litigation gave me the tools to challenge these deeply ingrained norms and legal structures that perpetuate inequality.

Movement lawyering has reinforced my belief that lawyers should not see themselves as the only experts in justice work. The communities we work with are the ones who should lead the way in defining what justice looks like. My role is to use the law strategically to serve their visions of justice rather than impose my own legal interpretations on them.

I also fundamentally don’t like being told what to do—something that has fuelled my resistance to systems that dictate how women should behave

As a Legal Counsel at KELIN, you engage in strategic litigation to drive social and policy change. Can you share a case or moment that reaffirmed your belief in using the law as a tool for justice, particularly for women’s land and property rights?

One of the most impactful cases I have worked on involved a young woman (LAW). She had been a teenage mother, married at 14, extremely poor, and contracted HIV, and was sterilised without her knowledge. Her story was one of compounded gender discrimination, health status, economic background each layer reinforcing the next.

What struck me was how young she was when all of these violations occurred. I remember meeting her and thinking about how at her age, I still felt like a child, yet she had already endured so much. Her case highlighted how systemic failures, from healthcare access to property rights, disproportionately harm women.

Another deeply impactful case was our litigation on ARV (antiretroviral) stockouts. It reinforced my belief in using the law strategically, especially after hearing testimonies from women forced to stop breastfeeding because of lack of access to medication. The moment a mother stood in court and said, “At least now the judge heard me,” I knew that even in loss, litigation can be a tool for dignity and visibility.

The moment a mother stood in court and said, “At least now the judge heard me,” I knew that even in loss, litigation can be a tool for dignity and visibility.

Winning the CSO Lawyer of the Year award from the Nairobi Legal Awards is a huge milestone. What does this recognition mean to you, and how do you see it contributing to your advocacy for feminist and human rights litigation?

Honestly, it was a surprise! When you are deep in the work, you don’t always realize that people are watching and appreciating what you do. For me, this award was not just about personal recognition—it was a reaffirmation that the work we do matters. It reminded me that our litigation strategies, advocacy efforts, and commitment to feminist justice are making a difference .

The award also encouraged me to keep pushing forward, despite the setbacks and frustrations that come with human rights work. It’s a reminder that even when we don’t immediately see the impact, the work is contributing to larger systemic shifts.

Any advice to the third Cohort of the FLN as they embark on their journey to becoming movement lawyers?

The FLN journey is intense and will push you in ways you didn’t expect. It requires unlearning, relearning, and being open to questioning your biases. My biggest advice is to stay committed even when it feels overwhelming. The knowledge, skills, and network you gain will shape your career in ways you may not realise immediately.

Movement lawyering is not just about the law; it’s about working with communities, centring their experiences, and recognising that justice is more than just a court ruling. Be patient with yourself, embrace the discomfort of learning new perspectives, and lean on the network for support.

Most importantly, take care of yourself. This work is exhausting, and burnout is real. The ethics of care apply not just to clients but also to ourselves. Give yourself grace and remember that change, especially feminist legal change, is a long-term struggle.

About Us

Founded in 2014, the Initiative for Strategic Litigation in Africa (ISLA) is a Pan-African and feminist initiative with a timely remit: to strengthen strategic human rights litigation across the African continent. Essentially, we aim to change the way that strategic litigation is used so as to enable broader access to justice and to support those who seek to hold states accountable for violations of women’s human rights and sexual rights.

Contact Details

Contact Number:

+27 11 338 9028

Fax: +27 11 338 9029

Address: 87 de Korte Street,
South Point Corner, 7th Floor Braamfontein, 2017 Gauteng, South Africa